<\/p>\n
From the workshop\u2019s abstract: <\/span> Text (PDF)<\/a><\/p>\n Links:<\/span> Budka, P. 2008. Report on CRASSH Workshop \u201cSubversion, Conversion, Development: Public Interests in Technologies\u201d, Cambridge, 24-26 April. From the workshop\u2019s abstract: As part of the \u201cNew forms of knowledge for the 21st Century\u201d research agenda at Cambridge University, the workshop will explore why designers and developers of new technologies should be interested in producing objects… Continue reading Report: CRASSH Workshop \u201cSubversion, Conversion, Development”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,91,54,99,213,103,71,42,7,45,74,33,29,26,111,80,106],"tags":[20,186,212,155,157,173,165],"class_list":["post-52","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-community","category-conference","category-cyberanthropology","category-digital-anthropology","category-digital-ethnography","category-ethnography","category-fieldwork","category-infrastructure","category-internet","category-media","category-methodology","category-politics","category-anthropology","category-technology","category-workshop","category-world","category-www-icts","tag-cyberanthropology","tag-digital-anthropology","tag-digital-ethnography","tag-icts","tag-internet","tag-media","tag-technology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.philbu.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.philbu.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.philbu.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.philbu.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.philbu.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=52"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/www.philbu.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":959,"href":"https:\/\/www.philbu.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52\/revisions\/959"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.philbu.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=52"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.philbu.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=52"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.philbu.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=52"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nAs part of the \u201cNew forms of knowledge for the 21st Century\u201d research agenda at Cambridge University, the workshop will explore why designers and developers of new technologies should be interested in producing objects that users can modify, redeploy or redevelop. This exploration demands an examination of presuppositions that underpin the knowledge practices associated with the various productions of information communication technologies (ICT). A central question is that of diversity: diversity of use, of purpose, and of value(s). Does diversity matter, in the production and use of ICT, and if so, why?<\/p>\n
\nhttp:\/\/www.crassh.cam.ac.uk\/events\/71\/
\nhttp:\/\/vectors.usc.edu\/thoughtmesh\/publish\/12.php<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"